Mirage owner Steve Wynn was so ecstatic with what happened that he made it his mission to use it as a jumping off point to battle Caesars Palace for the big fights.īuster Douglas asked for $25 million to fight Holyfield and, if he won $35 million for a Tyson rematch. The Mirage eventually gave that money and then some back People were calling the hotel asking for our reaction - we were the only ones who even considered that Buster could win."ġ0. "But that was nothing compared to the publicity we got from around the world. "We won like $400,000 on the fight, having booked about $13 million," Vaccaro said. The result made the Mirage the center of the sports betting world. So I told everyone, don't enter it in until we were sure."ĩ. "When the result came in, I didn't believe it," Vaccaro said. When the fight ended, the Mirage didn't pay out Douglas bettors for at least an hour. "We watched the updates on ESPN and paid attention to how they thought each round should be scored."Ĩ. The Mirage didn't show the fight in its sportsbookĮven though the Mirage sportsbook was the only game in town if bettors wanted to take a side, it didn't have the fight when the live broadcast started at 7:30 local time in Las Vegas on Feb. "All I was interested in was partying and f-ing women," Tyson would later say.Īt a sparring session that King charged $60 to get in, Tyson's sparring partner Greg Page knocked him down and King reportedly kicked people out of the gym.ħ. Tyson came to Japan a month before the fight and didn't want to train. The signs that Tyson was vulnerable were there. "He told me he'd be back to collect his money," Vaccaro said. Vaccaro said the biggest bet he received on Tyson was $168,000 to win $4,000. "I remember him saying to me, 'No fighter deserves that much respect.'" "I took a $1,500 bet from an old wiseguy at 38-to-1," Vaccaro said. Douglas was offered at 42-to-1, but a bet was never made at that price. He had the authority to do them himself.ĥ. Vaccaro said what made his position so unique was that, unlike so many of his other compatriots in Vegas, he didn't have to check with executives upstairs to make these moves. "I got something like a $93,000 bet on Tyson to win $3,000," Vaccaro said. He then raised it to 31-1 on Douglas and 1-31 on Tyson. With Douglas at 27-1 and Tyson at 1-27, Vaccaro said he got a bet on Tyson. No matter how high the Mirage raised the odds, bets on Tyson kept coming in. Wrote Schmitz: "When you're trying to persuade people to believe Douglas has a chance, false advertising is encouraged, if not a time-honored tradition - the fight racket."Ĥ. The pre-fight clippings are hilarious to read now because they are such cold takes, none colder than Orlando Sentinel columnist Brian Schmitz, who, in his column a day before the fight, wanted to charge fight promoter Don King with fraud. The press gave Douglas absolutely no chance. Prior to Tyson-Douglas, the greatest underdog to win a heavyweight title was James Braddock, known to many as "Cinderella Man," beating Max Baer in 1935. Anything offered above 10-to-1 would have made Douglas the biggest Heavyweight underdog of all time. The most popular bet across Vegas was for Tyson to drop Douglas and end the fight in either Round 2 or 3.Ģ. It's like, who would offer a moneyline on Centenary vs Alabama if they're a 65-point underdog?" "At some point, it's like what's the point in offering it anymore. "We were booking Tyson fights and, as he continued to crush people, the underdogs were going from 6-to-1 to 8-to-1," recalled Jimmy Vaccaro, the head bookmaker at the Mirage at the time. All sportsbooks offered odds on when Tyson would knock out Douglas, but only one - the Mirage - offered bettors the chance to bet on Tyson or Douglas straight-up. Thirty years later, there's plenty to clear up about "42-to-1" odds story.ġ. Mike Tyson, one of the biggest longshot victories ever in a head-to-head competition.īut as with all upset tales, Douglas over Tyson has taken on a life of its own after the fact. 11 marks the 32nd anniversary of Buster Douglas' 42-to-1 upset vs. Editor's note: This article was originally published in December 2018, before ESPN's airing of the "42 to 1" documentary.įeb.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |